problem stringclasses 130
values | gold_answer stringclasses 130
values | gold_answer_canon stringclasses 130
values | split stringclasses 1
value | step int64 0 0 | sample_idx int64 0 7 | enumeration stringclasses 6
values | endpoint stringclasses 1
value | deployment stringclasses 1
value | api_version stringclasses 1
value | temperature float64 1 1 | top_p float64 0.95 0.95 | pass1 dict | usage dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 0 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. ANAGRAM: Indicator could be “recovered” — plausible.\n2. CHARADE: “doctor with education” might indicate components combined.\n3. HIDDEN: No direct indicator for hidden text.\n4. REVERSAL: “recovered” might imply reversal — plausible but less likely here.\n5. HOMOPHONE: No sound... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 372,
"total_tokens": 1135
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 1 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n {anagram ✗ (no anagrind), charade ✓, substitution ✗, reversal ✗ (no reversal indicator), hidden ✗ (no hidden indicator), homophone ✗, container ✗, double def ✗, &lit ✗}. \n\nDefinition analysis: \n Likely definition is \"Recovered.\" \n\nAttempting CHARADE device: \n Indi... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 244,
"total_tokens": 1007
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 2 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze step by step:\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n 1. **Anagram:** Requires an indicator such as \"mix\", \"scrambled\", \"recovered\". The word \"recovered\" is a plausible anagrind.\n 2. **Charade:** Possible if \"doctor\" and \"education\" combine directly. Indicators such as \"with\" could i... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 447,
"total_tokens": 1210
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 3 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: Device triage.\n1. **Anagram**: Possible if there is an anagrind, but \"Recovered\" does not clearly suggest scrambling.\n2. **Reversal**: \"Recovered\" could work as an indicator for reversal, meaning something brought back or reversed.\n3. **Charade**: \"Doctor with education\" might spl... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 440,
"total_tokens": 1203
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 4 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n{anagram ✗ (no anagrind), container ✗ (no indicator), reversal ✗ (no reversal indicator), \nhidden ✗ (not suggested by clue structure), charade ✓ (“with” could signal concatenation), \nhomophone ✗ (no sound-related indicator), &lit ✗ (clue doesn’t self-define), double def ✓ (“r... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 265,
"total_tokens": 1028
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 5 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: Requires a clear anagram indicator (e.g., \"mix,\" \"shaken,\" etc.)—none are present here.\n - Reject: no anagrind.\n2. **Hidden**: Requires an indicator like \"seen in,\" \"inside,\" etc.—no sign of hidden phrasing.\n... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 429,
"total_tokens": 1192
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 6 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: {anagram ✓ (\"recovered\"), charade ✓ (\"with\"), abbr ✓ (\"doctor\" and \"education\"), hidden ✗, reversal ✗, homophone ✗, double def ✗, &lit ✗, letter selection ✗, substitution ✗, deletion ✗}.\n- ANAGRAM indicator “recovered”: plausible.\n- CHARADE indicator “with”: plausible.\n\n... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 468,
"total_tokens": 1231
} |
Recovered doctor with education (6) | HEALED | healed | test | 0 | 7 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. Anagram: Possible if there’s a clear indicator, but \"recovered\" does not directly imply mixing letters.\n2. Reversal: \"Recovered\" could imply reversal; worth exploring further.\n3. Charade: The clue components (\"doctor\" and \"education\") might combine stepwise.\n4. Homop... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 285,
"total_tokens": 1048
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 0 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step. \n\nThe given clue is “Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) (3).” I initially solved it assuming the enumeration (3) and arrived at TEA. However, now the enumeration is explicitly given as (3) (3). This indicates two words rather than one,... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 405,
"total_tokens": 1170
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 1 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe given clue states \"Mix TEA for a hot drink\" with an enumeration of (3) (3), not just (3). My earlier solution treated the enumeration incorrectly.\n\nLet’s analyze it:\n\n---\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: Possible... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 377,
"total_tokens": 1142
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 2 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue “Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) (3)” seems like the same clue as previously provided but with additional enumeration (3) (3) rather than just (3). Let's triage the devices carefully.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE\n• Anagram ✓ (“Mix... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 476,
"total_tokens": 1241
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 3 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue provided is “Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) (3)”. The original parse considered the enumeration as (3) only, but now it’s clear the enumeration is (3) (3). This changes the approach.\n\nStep A: DEVICE TRIAGE\n• **Anagram*... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 386,
"total_tokens": 1151
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 4 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue states \"Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) (3)\", with the enumeration (3) (3). The original solution considered the answer as \"TEA\" with (3) enumeration. However, the clue has a distinct (3) (3) format, implying two separ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 340,
"total_tokens": 1105
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 5 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue given is: Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) (3). At first glance, the enumeration has changed from (3) to (3,3), so the original parsing from previous examples won't fit this clue correctly. This discrepancy means we need to... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 480,
"total_tokens": 1245
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 6 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n- ANAGRAM: Indicator “Mix” suits; plausible.\n- HIDDEN: No hidden indicator like “as seen in”.\n- REVERSAL: “Mix” doesn’t suggest reversal.\n- HOMOPHONE: No “sounds like” clue here.\n- CHARADES: “Mix TEA” doesn’t suggest parts built sequentially.\n- DELETION, DOUBLE DEF, &LIT: Not ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 271,
"total_tokens": 1036
} |
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3) | TEA | tea | test | 0 | 7 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue states “Mix TEA for a hot drink” with enumeration (3) (3). Initially, the parse involved an anagram of TEA → TEA with the definition “a hot drink.” However, the enumeration (3) (3) contradicts that initial parsing, as ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 343,
"total_tokens": 1108
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 0 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. ANAGRAM: \"missing head\" doesn't suggest mixing or rearrangement, so rejected. \n2. DELETION: Plausible because \"missing head\" is indicative of letter removal. \n3. CHARADES: No clear sequential assembly indicated here, so rejected.\n4. OTHER: Reversal, homophone, hidden — n... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 188,
"total_tokens": 952
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 1 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's break this clue down step by step.\n\n**A) DEVICE TRIAGE** \n1. **Anagram**: The clue does not contain any clear anagram indicator. Reject. \n2. **Container**: There is no evident containment indicator. Reject. \n3. **Reversal**: No reversal indicator such as \"back\" or \"returned\" exis... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 716,
"total_tokens": 1480
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 2 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: {deletion ✓ (“missing head”), anagram ✗ (no anagrind), hidden ✗ (no hidden indicator), charade ✗, homophone ✗, …}\nDeletion seems promising because “missing head” is a clear indicator.\nDef: “Circle”.\nWordplay: Take “BRING”, remove the “head” (first letter, B), leaving RING.\nAccou... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 121,
"total_tokens": 885
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 3 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. **Anagram** — No clear anagrind; rejected.\n2. **Hidden** — No indicator suggesting hidden; rejected.\n3. **Charade** — Possible parsing through \"BRING missing head\"; workable.\n4. **Deletion** — Indicator \"missing head\" fits; plausible for subtracting the first letter.\n5. ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 251,
"total_tokens": 1015
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 4 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: No clear anagrind is present, so anagram is rejected.\n2. **Charade**: Possible since \"missing head\" might point to a subtraction. \"Circle from BRING missing head\" could involve separating elements, but not straightforw... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 439,
"total_tokens": 1203
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 5 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s evaluate plausible devices:\n\nDevice triage:\n1. **ANAGRAM**: No indicator present like \"mix,\" \"scrambled,\" or equivalent.\n2. **CONTAINER**: No wording suggesting placement or \"inside\" relationship.\n3. **REVERSAL**: No indicator present like \"back,\" \"reversed,\" or equivalent.\n4... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 335,
"total_tokens": 1099
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 6 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: No anagrind present.\n- Charade: Possible, as \"missing head\" could indicate removal.\n- Deletion: Plausible, as \"missing head\" can suggest removing the first letter.\n- Hidden: Not likely, no clear hidden indicator like \"se... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 327,
"total_tokens": 1091
} |
Circle from BRING missing head (4) | RING | ring | test | 0 | 7 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Deletion**: The phrase \"missing head\" strongly suggests a deletion operation, where the head (first letter) of a word is removed. Plausible device. Indicator: \"missing head.\"\n2. **Anagram**: No anagram indicator is present, so re... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 432,
"total_tokens": 1196
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 0 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n- Anagram ✗: No anagrind present.\n- Charade ✓: \"Finished\" and \"payment expected\" could be components combined stepwise to build the answer.\n- Homophone ✗: No indication of \"sounds like.\"\n- Reversal ✗: No reversal indicator.\n- Hidden ✗: No hidden indicator.\n- Double defin... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 307,
"total_tokens": 1071
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 1 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: No indication of \"mix\" or \"scramble\"; no anagrind present.\n2. **Container**: No containment indicator like \"inside\", \"held by\".\n3. **Reversal**: No reversal indicator like \"back\", \"returned\".\n4. **Hidden**: No indi... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 417,
"total_tokens": 1181
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 2 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. Anagram ✗: No clear anagrind in the clue.\n2. Charade ✓: Potential components: \"Late\" (definition?), \"finished\", and \"payment expected\".\n3. Double definition ✓: \"Late\" and \"payment expected\" might work together.\n4. Homophone ✗: No indicator of sound similarity.\n5. H... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 248,
"total_tokens": 1012
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 3 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: DEVICE TRIAGE \nPlausible devices: \n1. Double definition ✓ (\"Late\" and \"finished, payment expected\"). \n2. Anagram ✗ (no clear anagrind present). \n3. Charade ✗ (\"finished, payment expected\" doesn’t break into clear parts). \n4. Homophone ✗ (\"Late\" does not indicate a sound-r... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 238,
"total_tokens": 1002
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 4 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step:\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE\n- Possible devices: {anagram, container, reversal, hidden, charade, deletion, homophone, double def, &lit, letter selection, substitution, abbr}.\n- Examine potential indicators:\n 1. \"finished\" might suggest completion, but not any of t... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 342,
"total_tokens": 1106
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 5 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n- Anagram ✗: No clear anagrind in the clue.\n- Charade ✓: Clue seems to suggest parts (\"finished\" and \"payment expected\") building the answer.\n- Homophone ✗: No auditory clues.\n- Hidden ✗: No \"contained within\" indicator.\n- Double definition ✗: Definition is single and pr... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 201,
"total_tokens": 965
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 6 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's break this clue step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\nThe clue appears to have a definition (\"Late\") and wordplay (\"finished, payment expected\"). Possible devices include:\n1. **Charade**: A sequential build using wordplay elements.\n - Indicators: “finished” and “payment expected” co... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 371,
"total_tokens": 1135
} |
Late — finished, payment expected (7) | OVERDUE | overdue | test | 0 | 7 | 7 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, we need to examine plausible devices.\n\nDevice triage:\n1. ANAGRAM: Indicators could include \"finished\", \"payment expected\", or other synonyms suggesting rearrangement — rejected for lack of clear anagrind.\n2. CHARADES: Sequential parts of the clue potentially yielding the answer — wo... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 339,
"total_tokens": 1103
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 0 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s evaluate the clue step by step.\n\n**A) DEVICE TRIAGE**\n1. **Reversal**: plausible due to “comes back”; indicator is clear.\n2. **Anagram**: plausible but lacks a clear indicator (e.g., “mix,” “confused”).\n3. **Hidden**: rejected—no “hidden” indicator present.\n4. **Homophone**: rejected—n... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 314,
"total_tokens": 1079
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 1 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s analyze this clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE \nPotential devices to consider include: \n1. **Reversal**: The indicator could be \"comes back\", suggesting the reversal of a word or phrase. \n2. **Anagram**: No explicit anagram indicator is present, so this device is unlikely. \n3.... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 293,
"total_tokens": 1058
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 2 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze this clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE \nPotential devices: \n1. **Reversal**: plausible due to “comes back” as a reversal indicator. \n2. **Anagram**: \"MINED\" could be fodder, but no valid anagram indicator is seen. \n3. **Hidden**: no clear hidden indicator here. \n4. *... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 264,
"total_tokens": 1029
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 3 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Reversal**: The phrase “comes back” strongly suggests reversal. The fodder “MINED” could be reversed.\n Indicator: “comes back” is a clear reversal indicator.\n This device is plausible.\n2. **Anagram**: No clear anagrind is pre... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 350,
"total_tokens": 1115
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 4 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n Possible devices to consider include:\n - **Reversal:** “comes back” suggests reversal may be in play.\n - **Anagram:** no clear anagrind present.\n - **Hidden:** not supported as there’s no containment indicator.\n - **Charad... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 282,
"total_tokens": 1047
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 5 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: DEVICE TRIAGE \n• Plausible devices: {reversal, anagram, container, hidden, charade, &lit, homophone, letter selection, deletion, substitution, abbreviation}. \n• Reversal ✓: Indicator \"comes back.\" \n• Anagram ✗: No clear anagrind. \n• Hidden ✗: No indicator like \"in\" or \"hidden ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 331,
"total_tokens": 1096
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 6 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. REVERSAL ✓: Indicator “comes back” suggests a reversal.\n2. ANAGRAM ✗: No clear anagram indicator.\n3. HIDDEN ✗: “comes back” doesn’t suggest hidden.\n4. CHARADES ✗: Structure doesn’t suit splitting the clue logically into components with direct concatenation.\n5. HOMOPHONE ✗: N... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 286,
"total_tokens": 1051
} |
Cloth, when MINED comes back (5) | DENIM | denim | test | 0 | 7 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: Device triage.\n- ANAGRAM: Indicator could be \"comes back,\" but \"MINED\" isn't marked for scrambling and doesn't suggest reordering explicitly.\n- REVERSAL: \"comes back\" strongly suggests reversal; plausible device.\n- HIDDEN: No indicator like \"in\" or \"contains.\"\n- HOMOPHONE: No... | {
"prompt_tokens": 765,
"completion_tokens": 280,
"total_tokens": 1045
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 0 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. ANAGRAM: Possible if anagrind is found (none visible). Reject.\n2. HIDDEN: Could work if \"Close; marine mammal\" contained the answer hidden somewhere. Reject—no indicator like \"in\" or \"contained\".\n3. REVERSAL: No reversal indicator (\"back\" or equivalent). Reject.\n4. CH... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 253,
"total_tokens": 1016
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 1 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. Hidden: No clear indicator for hidden.\n2. Anagram: No indicator for scrambling.\n3. Charade: “Close” + “marine mammal” might combine directly, plausible.\n4. Homophone: No indicator for soundalike.\n5. Double definition: Plausible since the clue seems to split neatly into two d... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 232,
"total_tokens": 995
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 2 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let's triage plausible devices from the given clue. We have:\n\n1. **&lit** (wordplay and definition combined): Possible due to phrasing that hints at a marine mammal and \"close\" potentially describing behavior of proximity or habitat.\n2. **Double definition**: Possible with \"close\" an... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 407,
"total_tokens": 1170
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 3 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let's triage plausible devices for the clue \"Close; marine mammal (4) (4)\".\n\n1. **Anagram**: No anagrind is apparent in this clue, so reject.\n2. **Container**: No containment indicator like \"holds,\" \"around,\" etc., so reject.\n3. **Reversal**: No reversal indicator like \"back,\" \... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 405,
"total_tokens": 1168
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 4 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. Hidden: No clear hidden indicator like \"as seen in\" or similar present—REJECTED.\n2. Anagram: No anagram indicator like \"mix,\" \"confused,\" etc.—REJECTED.\n3. Reversal: No reversal indicator like \"back,\" \"returned,\" etc.—REJECTED.\n4. Charade: Plausible. The clue... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 278,
"total_tokens": 1041
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 5 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. Anagram ✗: There is no clear anagrind suggesting rearrangement, and the fodder isn't evident.\n2. Container ✗: No indicator for containment (e.g., \"inside,\" \"held by\").\n3. Reversal ✗: No reversal indicator like \"turned\" or \"back.\"\n4. Hidden ✗: No hidden indicator such ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 337,
"total_tokens": 1100
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 6 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's carefully analyze the clue.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\nThe clue has two parts: \"Close\" and \"marine mammal,\" with the enumeration (4) (4). Possible devices include:\n1. Charade: combining elements from \"Close\" and \"marine mammal.\"\n - Plausible since the definition might involve splittin... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 376,
"total_tokens": 1139
} |
Close; marine mammal (4) | SEAL | seal | test | 0 | 7 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let us assess the potential devices in triage:\n\n1. **Anagram**: Needs an anagrind, but \"Close; marine mammal\" lacks clear indicators like \"scrambled,\" \"mixed,\" or similar. Reject.\n2. **Hidden**: Requires a containment indicator like \"seen in\" or \"hidden inside.\" There's no such... | {
"prompt_tokens": 763,
"completion_tokens": 367,
"total_tokens": 1130
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 0 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n1. Double definition (✓): The clue could suggest two meanings for the solution. \"Letter\" and \"money\" are separate meanings that may lead to the same answer. No indicators required; this device works well here.\n2. Charade (✗): There are no linking words suggesting a sequential ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 326,
"total_tokens": 1087
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 1 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze this clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Double definition** seems plausible:\n - There are two distinct senses: \"Letter\" and \"money\". \n - Indicator: None is explicitly required for a double definition.\n - Plausible.\n \n2. **Charade** is unlikely:\n - No cl... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 430,
"total_tokens": 1191
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 2 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: Device triage for plausible parsing methods:\n1. Double definition ✓: \"Letter\" and \"money\" might independently define the same solution. No indicator required.\n2. Charade ✗: No words suggesting a breakdown of components (\"on\", \"with\", etc.).\n3. Anagram ✗: No anagrind (mix, scramb... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 308,
"total_tokens": 1069
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 3 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's proceed systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n - Plausible devices to test: {double def, charade, homophone, anagram, hidden, container, etc.}.\n - Double definition: “Letter” and “money” could have different meanings but lead to the same word. Let’s check.\n - Charade: Could combine s... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 306,
"total_tokens": 1067
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 4 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. Double definition ✓ (“Letter” and “money” are plausible definitions). \n2. Charade ✗ (no clear linking components or instructions for wordplay). \n3. Anagram ✗ (no anagrind or usable fodder). \n4. Homophone ✗ (no indicator suggesting sound-alike). \n5. Hidden ✗ (no contain... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 184,
"total_tokens": 945
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 5 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: DEVICE TRIAGE\n• Plausible devices:\n 1. DOUBLE DEFINITION: Indicator could be implicit (punning).\n 2. ANAGRAM: Needs clear anagrind (not apparent here).\n 3. CHARADES: Needs explicit concatenation words (not here).\n 4. HOMOPHONE: Requires phonetic indicator (not here).\n 5. HIDDEN:... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 298,
"total_tokens": 1059
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 6 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's break this clue step by step:\n\nDevice triage:\n1. &lit: Not a clear fit; no phrase ties the entire clue to both definition and wordplay.\n2. Double definition: Potential! “Letter” and “money” might both work as distinct meanings.\n3. Anagram: No anagrind is present, so this is unlikely.\n4... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 295,
"total_tokens": 1056
} |
Letter or money (4) | NOTE | note | test | 0 | 7 | 4 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. DOUBLE DEFINITION: Plausible device for \"letter\" and \"money\"—no clear indicator word needed. \n2. ANAGRAM: Unlikely due to lack of clear anagrind. \n3. HOMOPHONE: Reject—no \"sound\" indicator. \n4. CHARADES: Unlikely due to lack of clear concatenation signals. \n5. CO... | {
"prompt_tokens": 761,
"completion_tokens": 227,
"total_tokens": 988
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 0 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device: HIDDEN; indicator “found in”.\nDef: “Pet”. Wordplay: hidden in “deliCATe” → CAT.\nEnumeration: (3) OK.</think>\n<answer>CAT</answer>",
"pred_answer": "CAT",
"pred_answer_canon": "cat",
"is_correct_pred": true,
"valid_tag_structure": true,
"finish_reason": "stop",
"enumeration":... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 49,
"total_tokens": 813
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 1 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's approach this systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Hidden clue ✓: “found in” suggests it might be hidden. Fodder “deliCATe” potentially hides the answer. \n- Anagram ✗: No anagrind present (e.g., no indicators like \"mixed,\" \"shaken,\" or similar).\n- Charade ✗: No evidence of splitting... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 360,
"total_tokens": 1124
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 2 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n{hidden ✓ (“found in”), anagram ✗ (no anagrind), charade ✗, homophone ✗, …}\nHidden device is plausible, indicator word: \"found in\".\nReject others since no indicators or fodder match for them.\n\nParse:\nDefinition: “Pet”.\nWordplay: hidden in “deliCATe” → CAT.\nEnumeration (3) ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 126,
"total_tokens": 890
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 3 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. HIDDEN ✓: The phrase “found in” is a hidden indicator. \n2. ANAGRAM ✗: No clear anagrind present. \n3. CHARADES ✗: No explicit joining elements. \n4. REVERSAL ✗: No reversal indicator like “back”. \n5. HOMOPHONE ✗: No sound-alike indicator like “by the sound of”. \n6. OTH... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 160,
"total_tokens": 924
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 4 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>DEVICE TRIAGE: \n• HIDDEN ✓ (indicator “found in”): plausible. \n• Anagram ✗ (no anagrind visible). \n• Charade ✗ (“found in” does not suggest a charade). \n• Homophone ✗ (“found in” does not suggest a sound-alike). \n• Reversal ✗, Container ✗: no clear indication. \n• Others (double definition, &... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 202,
"total_tokens": 966
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 5 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. HIDDEN: plausible because “found in” is a common hidden indicator.\n2. ANAGRAM: rejected—no anagrind present.\n3. REVERSAL: rejected—no reversal indicator.\n4. CHARADES: rejected—no clear components and linkage.\n5. HOMOPHONE: rejected—no sound-related indicator.\n6. DOUBLE DEF... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 181,
"total_tokens": 945
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 6 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage:\n- HIDDEN: Plausible due to “found in”, indicating the answer might be embedded in the clue’s fodder. \n- ANAGRAM: Rejected; no anagram indicator.\n- REVERSAL: Rejected; no reversal indicator.\n- HOMOPHONE: Rejected; no sound-related indicator.\n- CHARADE: Rejected; not enough separ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 166,
"total_tokens": 930
} |
Pet found in deliCATe (3) | CAT | cat | test | 0 | 7 | 3 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's approach this clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- HIDDEN: Possible. Indicator \"found in\" suggests hidden fodder. Check if the answer can be extracted as a substring.\n- ANAGRAM: Unlikely. No clear anagrind like \"mix\" or \"scramble\".\n- REVERSAL: Unlikely. No clear indicator like ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 314,
"total_tokens": 1078
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 0 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s solve step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE \nPossible devices: \n• **Reversal**: Indicator “on the up” suggests reversal (directional clue). \n• **Charade**: Potential for parts combined sequentially. \n• **Double definition**: Could be two meanings fitting “outcome”. \n• **Anagram**: No c... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 314,
"total_tokens": 1078
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 1 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's consider the clue \"Outcome — try on the up (6) (6)\" systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. ANAGRAM: There is no clear anagram indicator such as \"mix\" or \"scramble\".\n2. CONTAINER: No container indicators like \"inside\" or \"within\".\n3. REVERSAL: Indicator \"on the up\" suggests re... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 376,
"total_tokens": 1140
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 2 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let us begin by analyzing the clue systematically.\n\n**Device triage:**\n1. **Reversal**: The phrase \"on the up\" could suggest reversal (word or phrase going upward, potentially relevant for Across or Down clues). Plausible indicator: \"on the up.\"\n2. **Charade**: There’s a potential splittin... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 381,
"total_tokens": 1145
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 3 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let's triage the possible devices for solving this clue:\n\n1. **Anagram**: Requires an anagram indicator. \"Outcome\" could suggest rearrangement, but the fodder isn't immediately clear, and (6) (6) doesn't match an obvious anagram pattern. REJECTED.\n2. **Reversal**: \"on the up\" could s... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 629,
"total_tokens": 1393
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 4 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: DEVICE TRIAGE \n- **Reversal**: Plausible, because \"on the up\" suggests reversal. Indicator: \"on the up\". \n- **Anagram**: Not plausible; no anagrind provided. \n- **Charade**: Plausible, as \"try on\" could mean parts combined. \n- **Container**: Not plausible; no containment indi... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 352,
"total_tokens": 1116
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 5 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let's analyze possible devices:\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. Anagram — No explicit anagrind present like \"mix\" or \"scrambled\".\n2. Container — No container word/phrase indicated.\n3. Reversal — \"on the up\" could be a reversal indicator, as it suggests upward movement.\n4. Hidden — \"on th... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 346,
"total_tokens": 1110
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 6 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's solve this clue systematically.\n\n### DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Reversal**: Plausible, due to \"on the up\" (indicator of reversal in an across clue).\n - Indicator: \"on the up\".\n2. **Anagram**: Not indicated; \"try on the up\" does not suggest an anagram.\n3. **Charade**: Possible, though ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 306,
"total_tokens": 1070
} |
Outcome — try on the up (6) | UPSHOT | upshot | test | 0 | 7 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's start the triage for this clue: \"Outcome — try on the up (6).\"\n\nDEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Reversal**: Possible due to \"on the up,\" which can indicate flipping direction. This deserves exploration. \n2. **Anagram**: No anagram indicator (\"mix,\" \"confused,\" etc.) here. Reject.\n3. **Conta... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 290,
"total_tokens": 1054
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 0 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s break the clue into components and evaluate potential devices.\n\n### DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Charade:** \n - “Prophet with gold, current and French article” suggests individual parts that could combine sequentially. Indicators like “with” suggest addition/assembly.\n - Plausible candidate ... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 420,
"total_tokens": 1186
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 1 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>First, let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: There's no clear anagrind (\"mix\", etc.), so ✗.\n2. **Charade**: Plausible, since multiple elements (\"gold\", \"current\", \"French article\") are listed as separate parts. ✓.\n3. **Container**: No container indic... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 696,
"total_tokens": 1462
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 2 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>\nLet’s analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE\nPossible cryptic devices to consider: \n1. Charade ✓ - The clue might involve combining parts (gold, current, French article) to form the answer.\n2. Anagram ✗ - No anagram indicator is present.\n3. Hidden ✗ - No hidden indicator is evide... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 596,
"total_tokens": 1362
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 3 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Step A: Device triage\n• Plausible devices: {charade, container, anagram, hidden, abbreviation}.\n• Indicators:\n - \"with\" suggests charade (components placed together).\n - No sign of an anagrind (e.g., mix, shuffle), so anagram rejected.\n - No hidden indicator, so hidden rejected.\n - Abb... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 321,
"total_tokens": 1087
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 4 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### Device triage:\n- **Charade**: Plausible due to multiple components (\"gold\", \"current\", \"French article\"). Fits well with wordplay construction.\n - Indicators: None explicitly needed; charades are additive by nature.\n- **Anagram**: No clear anag... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 377,
"total_tokens": 1143
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 5 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nDevice triage:\n- **Charade** seems plausible here due to the construction: elements \"gold\", \"current\", and \"French article\" are likely juxtaposed.\n- **Anagram** is unlikely as there is no clear anagrind present.\n- **Hidden** is implausible—no indica... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 431,
"total_tokens": 1197
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 6 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let's approach this systematically.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: There's no clear anagram indicator (e.g., \"mix,\" \"crazy\"). Rejected.\n2. **Hidden**: No hidden indicator (e.g., \"seen in,\" \"lurking in\"). Rejected.\n3. **Reversal**: No reversal indicator (e.g., \"back,\" \"around\")... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 608,
"total_tokens": 1374
} |
Prophet with gold, current and French article (6) | ORACLE | oracle | test | 0 | 7 | 6 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s consider possible devices for this clue.\n\nDevices:\n1. Charade: “with” suggests addition of parts.\n - Components: “gold” (AU, elemental symbol or OR, heraldic term for gold), “current” (I, physics abbreviation), “French article” (LE or LA, definite articles in French).\n2. Anagram: Unli... | {
"prompt_tokens": 766,
"completion_tokens": 306,
"total_tokens": 1072
} |
harmonise with English music collection (5) | SUITE | suite | test | 0 | 0 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Device triage: Let us evaluate plausible devices.\n\n1. **Anagram**: Requires an anagrind, none apparent in the clue.\n → Reject: no indicator.\n\n2. **Charade**: Breaking the clue into parts: \"harmonise with English\" + \"music collection.\"\n → Seems plausible with definitions matching part... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 527,
"total_tokens": 1291
} |
harmonise with English music collection (5) | SUITE | suite | test | 0 | 1 | 5 | https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com | gpt-4o | 2025-01-01-preview | 1 | 0.95 | {
"output": "<think>Let’s break this clue down step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Hidden: ✗ No hidden indicator present like “in” or “seen in”.\n- Anagram: ✗ No clear anagrind like “mix” or “scrambled”.\n- Charade: ✓ Possible; “English” (E), plus “music collection” could be clues for successive parts.\n- Homophone... | {
"prompt_tokens": 764,
"completion_tokens": 390,
"total_tokens": 1154
} |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
gpt4o-xwords-t1
This dataset repo contains external-model traces used in the Illusion-of-Reasoning analysis.
- Domain:
Xwords - Model:
GPT-4o - Target temperature label:
1 - Rows in
data.jsonl:1040 - Source artifact:
/n/fs/similarity/Illusion-of-Reasoning/artifacts/results/gpt4o-xword-azure-multicue-temp1/step0000_test.jsonl
Notes:
- Full G=8 traces from local artifact root.
- Rows are uploaded as raw JSONL records from the local analysis artifacts.
- Downloads last month
- 28