Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
problem
stringclasses
130 values
gold_answer
stringclasses
130 values
gold_answer_canon
stringclasses
130 values
split
stringclasses
1 value
step
int64
0
0
sample_idx
int64
0
7
enumeration
stringclasses
6 values
endpoint
stringclasses
2 values
deployment
stringclasses
1 value
api_version
stringclasses
2 values
temperature
float64
0
0
top_p
float64
0.95
0.95
pass1
dict
usage
dict
pass2a
dict
pass2b
dict
pass2c
dict
pass2d
dict
pass2
dict
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
0
6
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, but no clear anagrind present.\n- Charade: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the answer.\n- Container: Unlikely, no container indicator.\n- Reversal: Unlikely, no reversal indicator.\n- H...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 582, "total_tokens": 1345 }
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe previous reasoning failed because \"HEALER LEARNED\" does not clearly mean \"recovered,\" and the parsing was forced without strong justification. Let's carefully re-evaluate the clue.\n\nClue: \"Recovered doctor with educa...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right. Let's restart and work through the solution systematically, step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator.\n- Charade: Possible, as \"doctor with education\" could combine parts to form the answer.\n- Container:...
{ "output": "<think>You're right, something is off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, but no clear anagram indicator is present.\n- Charade: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the ...
{ "output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue again step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, but no clear anagram indicator is present.\n- Charade: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the answer.\n- Container: Unlikely, no cont...
{ "output": "<think>You're right, something is off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, but no clear anagram indicator is present.\n- Charade: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the ...
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
0
6
https://liv.services.ai.azure.com
gpt-4o
2024-05-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. Anagram ✗: No clear anagrind present. \n2. Charade ✓: “doctor” and “education” could be components combined sequentially. \n3. Container ✗: No container indicator like “inside” or “around”. \n4. Reversal ✗: No reversal indicator like “back” or “returned”. \n5. Hidden ✗: No...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 691, "total_tokens": 1454 }
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step. \n\nThe previous reasoning failed because the proposed answer \"HEALED LEARNING\" does not make sense as a valid cryptic crossword solution. It does not fit the definition \"Recovered doctor with education\" logically or idiomati...
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step. \n\nThe previous approach failed because the parsing and reasoning were inconsistent with cryptic crossword conventions. Specifically, the enumeration (6) (6) was not properly addressed, and the wordplay did not align with the cl...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely correct—something is off. Let's reconsider step by step.\n\nThe clue is: **Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)**. \nThe enumeration (6) (6) suggests two separate words. The definition is likely \"Recovered,\" and the wordplay involves \"doctor\" and \"education.\" Let's re-r...
{ "output": "<think>Let’s carefully analyze the clue again: “Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)”.\n\n### Step A: Device triage\n1. **Anagram** ✗: No clear anagram indicator (e.g., \"mixed\", \"scrambled\").\n2. **Charade** ✓: The clue suggests combining elements sequentially: “doctor” + “education” could form th...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely correct—something is off. Let's reconsider step by step.\n\nThe clue is: **Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)**. \nThe enumeration (6) (6) suggests two separate words. The definition is likely \"Recovered,\" and the wordplay involves \"doctor\" and \"education.\" Let's re-r...
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
1
6
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Device triage: \n1. ANAGRAM: Possible, but no clear anagrind present. \n2. CHARADES: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine stepwise. \n3. CONTAINER: Unlikely, no containment indicator. \n4. REVERSAL: Unlikely, no reversal indicator. \n5. HIDDEN: Unlikely, no hidden indicato...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 310, "total_tokens": 1073 }
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step. \n\nThe previous reasoning failed because the definition \"Recovered\" does not logically fit with \"GP TRAINING\". \"Recovered\" implies regaining something, which doesn't align with the idea of \"doctor with education\". Let's ...
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step. \nThe previous approach failed because the parsing of \"GP TRAINING\" does not logically fit the definition \"Recovered\" or the wordplay elements \"doctor with education\". Let's restart and systematically analyze the clue.\n\nC...
{ "output": "<think>You're right; we need to reconsider. The previous parsing failed because \"GP TRAINING\" does not logically fit the definition \"Recovered.\" Let's analyze the clue step by step again.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **ANAGRAM**: Possible, as \"recovered\"...
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe previous attempt failed because \"GP TRAINING\" does not logically fit the definition \"Recovered.\" The definition must directly match the solution, and \"Recovered\" does not describe \"GP TRAINING.\" Let's re-run the pro...
{ "output": "<think>You're right; we need to reconsider. The previous parsing failed because \"GP TRAINING\" does not logically fit the definition \"Recovered.\" Let's analyze the clue step by step again.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **ANAGRAM**: Possible, as \"recovered\"...
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
1
6
https://liv.services.ai.azure.com
gpt-4o
2024-05-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, but no clear anagrind present.\n- Charade: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the answer.\n- Container: Unlikely, no container indicator.\n- Reversal: Unlikely, no reversal indicator.\n- H...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 516, "total_tokens": 1279 }
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe previous reasoning failed because the definition \"Recovered\" doesn't clearly fit \"MEDICAL TRAINING.\" Additionally, the parsing of \"doctor with education\" as \"MEDICAL TRAINING\" was overly forced and didn't align well...
{ "output": "<think>Understood. Let's restart and work through the solution systematically step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagrind (indicator for scrambling letters).\n- Charade: Possible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine sequentially.\n- Contain...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right; something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6,6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagrind (indicator for scrambling letters).\n- Charade: Possible, as \"doctor\" and \"educa...
{ "output": "<think>Let's carefully analyze the clue again: \"Recovered doctor with education (6,6).\"\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, but no clear anagram indicator is present.\n2. **Charade**: Plausible, as \"doctor\" and \"education\" could combine to form the answer.\n3. **Container**: Unlikely, n...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right; something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor with education (6,6)\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagrind (indicator for scrambling letters).\n- Charade: Possible, as \"doctor\" and \"educa...
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
2
6
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could be an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder provided for a single anagram.\n2. **Charade**: Possible, as \"with\" could indicate a combination of parts.\n3. **Container**: ...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 664, "total_tokens": 1427 }
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right—let's go back and carefully reconsider each step. The reasoning earlier was rushed and unclear. We'll start fresh and analyze the clue systematically.\n\n### Clue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\n---\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: \"Recovered\" could be...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right—let's restart and work through the solution systematically. We'll follow the A–D process step by step.\n\n---\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: \"Recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator, suggesting the fodder might be scrambled. Plausible.\n2. **Charade**: \"Wi...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right—something is not right. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\n### Clue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\n---\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder for...
{ "output": "<think>Let's carefully analyze the clue again: \"Recovered doctor with education (6) (6).\"\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder provided for a single anagram.\n2. **Charade**: Likely, as \"with\" suggests...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right—something is not right. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\n### Clue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\n---\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder for...
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
2
6
https://liv.services.ai.azure.com
gpt-4o
2024-05-01-preview
0
0.95
{ "output": "<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could be an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder provided for a single anagram.\n2. **Charade**: Possible, as \"with\" suggests combining parts.\n3. **Container**: Unlikely, as ...
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 562, "total_tokens": 1325 }
{ "output": "<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator. We need to check if the fodder is present and matches the enumeration.\n2. **Charade**: Possible, as \"with\" suggests combinin...
{ "output": "<think>You're absolutely right—let's restart and work through the solution systematically.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could serve as an anagram indicator. We should check if the fodder is present and matches the enumeration.\n2. **Charade**: Possible, as \"with\" ...
{ "output": "<think>You're right, something feels off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\n### Clue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could serve as an anagram indicator. However, we need to identify clear fodder for this.\n2....
{ "output": "<think>Let's carefully analyze the clue again step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could act as an anagram indicator. However, there is no clear fodder provided for a single anagram.\n2. **Charade**: Possible, as \"with\" suggests combining parts.\n3. **Contai...
{ "output": "<think>You're right, something feels off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue step by step.\n\n### Clue: Recovered doctor with education (6) (6)\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Possible, as \"recovered\" could serve as an anagram indicator. However, we need to identify clear fodder for this.\n2....
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
3
6
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{"output":"<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Poss(...TRUNCATED)
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 601, "total_tokens": 1364 }
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely right—let's go back and carefully reanalyze the clue step by s(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely right—let's restart and work through the solution systematical(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct—something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by st(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\n### A) DEVICE TRIAGE\n1. **Anagram**: Poss(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct—something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by st(...TRUNCATED)
Recovered doctor with education (6)
HEALED
healed
test
0
3
6
https://liv.services.ai.azure.com
gpt-4o
2024-05-01-preview
0
0.95
{"output":"<think>Let's analyze the clue step by step.\n\nA) DEVICE TRIAGE:\n- Anagram: Possible, bu(...TRUNCATED)
{ "prompt_tokens": 763, "completion_tokens": 542, "total_tokens": 1305 }
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe previou(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe previou(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by ste(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>Let's carefully analyze the clue again step by step.\n\nClue: Recovered doctor wit(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is off. Let's reconsider the clue step by ste(...TRUNCATED)
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3)
TEA
tea
test
0
0
3
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue is(...TRUNCATED)
{ "prompt_tokens": 765, "completion_tokens": 342, "total_tokens": 1107 }
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely right; let's carefully reconsider the reasoning step by step.\n\(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely right. Let's restart and work through the solution systematicall(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is not right. Let's reconsider the clue step (...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue is(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is not right. Let's reconsider the clue step (...TRUNCATED)
Mix TEA for a hot drink (3)
TEA
tea
test
0
1
3
https://liv.cognitiveservices.azure.com
gpt-4o
2025-01-01-preview
0
0.95
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue is(...TRUNCATED)
{ "prompt_tokens": 765, "completion_tokens": 334, "total_tokens": 1099 }
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue is(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely right—let's restart and work through the solution systematical(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue s(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>Wait, we need to reconsider. Let's think this through step by step.\n\nThe clue is(...TRUNCATED)
{"output":"<think>You're absolutely correct; something is off. Let's carefully reconsider the clue s(...TRUNCATED)
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

gpt4o-xwords-t0

This dataset repo contains external-model traces used in the Illusion-of-Reasoning analysis.

  • Domain: Xwords
  • Model: GPT-4o
  • Target temperature label: 0
  • Rows in data.jsonl: 1040
  • Source artifact: /n/fs/similarity/Illusion-of-Reasoning/artifacts/results/gpt4o-xword-azure-multicue/step0000_test.jsonl

Notes:

  • Full G=8 traces from local artifact root.
  • Rows are uploaded as raw JSONL records from the local analysis artifacts.
Downloads last month
26