1. Model Introduction
Vedika 2.0 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model that advances practical capabilities in long-horizon coding, coding-driven design, proactive autonomous execution, and swarm-based task orchestration.
Key Features
- Long-Horizon Coding: Vedika 2.0 achieves significant improvements on complex, end-to-end coding tasks, generalizing robustly across programming languages (Rust, Go, Python) and domains spanning front-end, DevOps, and performance optimization.
- Coding-Driven Design: Vedika 2.0 is capable of transforming simple prompts and visual inputs into production-ready interfaces and lightweight full-stack workflows, generating structured layouts, interactive elements, and rich animations with deliberate aesthetic precision.
- Elevated Agent Swarm: Scaling horizontally to 300 sub-agents executing 4,000 coordinated steps, Vedika 2.0 can dynamically decompose tasks into parallel, domain-specialized subtasks, delivering end-to-end outputs from documents to websites to spreadsheets in a single autonomous run.
- Proactive & Open Orchestration: For autonomous tasks, Vedika 2.0 demonstrates strong performance in powering persistent, 24/7 background agents that proactively manage schedules, execute code, and orchestrate cross-platform operations without human oversight.
2. Model Summary
| Architecture | Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) |
| Total Parameters | 1T |
| Activated Parameters | 32B |
| Number of Layers (Dense layer included) | 61 |
| Number of Dense Layers | 1 |
| Attention Hidden Dimension | 7168 |
| MoE Hidden Dimension (per Expert) | 2048 |
| Number of Attention Heads | 64 |
| Number of Experts | 384 |
| Selected Experts per Token | 8 |
| Number of Shared Experts | 1 |
| Vocabulary Size | 160K |
| Context Length | 256K |
| Attention Mechanism | MLA |
| Activation Function | SwiGLU |
| Vision Encoder | MoonViT |
| Parameters of Vision Encoder | 400M |
3. Evaluation Results
| Benchmark | Vedika 2.0 | GPT-5.4 (xhigh) |
Claude Opus 4.6 (max effort) |
Gemini 3.1 Pro (thinking high) |
Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | |||||
| HLE-Full (w/ tools) |
54.0 | 52.1 | 53.0 | 51.4 | 50.2 |
| BrowseComp | 83.2 | 82.7 | 83.7 | 85.9 | 74.9 |
| BrowseComp (Agent Swarm) |
86.3 | 78.4 | |||
| DeepSearchQA (f1-score) |
92.5 | 78.6 | 91.3 | 81.9 | 89.0 |
| DeepSearchQA (accuracy) |
83.0 | 63.7 | 80.6 | 60.2 | 77.1 |
| WideSearch (item-f1) |
80.8 | - | - | - | 72.7 |
| Toolathlon | 50.0 | 54.6 | 47.2 | 48.8 | 27.8 |
| MCPMark | 55.9 | 62.5* | 56.7* | 55.9* | 29.5 |
| Claw Eval (pass^3) | 62.3 | 60.3 | 70.4 | 57.8 | 52.3 |
| Claw Eval (pass@3) | 80.9 | 78.4 | 82.4 | 82.9 | 75.4 |
| APEX-Agents | 27.9 | 33.3 | 33.0 | 32.0 | 11.5 |
| OSWorld-Verified | 73.1 | 75.0 | 72.7 | - | 63.3 |
| Coding | |||||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2) |
66.7 | 65.4* | 65.4 | 68.5 | 50.8 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 58.6 | 57.7 | 53.4 | 54.2 | 50.7 |
| SWE-Bench Multilingual | 76.7 | - | 77.8 | 76.9* | 73.0 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 80.2 | - | 80.8 | 80.6 | 76.8 |
| SciCode | 52.2 | 56.6 | 51.9 | 58.9 | 48.7 |
| OJBench (python) | 60.6 | - | 60.3 | 70.7 | 54.7 |
| LiveCodeBench (v6) | 89.6 | - | 88.8 | 91.7 | 85.0 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | |||||
| HLE-Full | 34.7 | 39.8 | 40.0 | 44.4 | 30.1 |
| AIME 2026 | 96.4 | 99.2 | 96.7 | 98.3 | 95.8 |
| HMMT 2026 (Feb) | 92.7 | 97.7 | 96.2 | 94.7 | 87.1 |
| IMO-AnswerBench | 86.0 | 91.4 | 75.3 | 91.0* | 81.8 |
| GPQA-Diamond | 90.5 | 92.8 | 91.3 | 94.3 | 87.6 |
| Vision | |||||
| MMMU-Pro | 79.4 | 81.2 | 73.9 | 83.0* | 78.5 |
| MMMU-Pro (w/ python) | 80.1 | 82.1 | 77.3 | 85.3* | 77.7 |
| CharXiv (RQ) | 80.4 | 82.8* | 69.1 | 80.2* | 77.5 |
| CharXiv (RQ) (w/ python) | 86.7 | 90.0* | 84.7 | 89.9* | 78.7 |
| MathVision | 87.4 | 92.0* | 71.2* | 89.8* | 84.2 |
| MathVision (w/ python) | 93.2 | 96.1* | 84.6* | 95.7* | 85.0 |
| BabyVision | 39.8 | 49.7 | 14.8 | 51.6 | 36.5 |
| BabyVision (w/ python) | 68.5 | 80.2* | 38.4* | 68.3* | 40.5 |
| V* (w/ python) | 96.9 | 98.4* | 86.4* | 96.9* | 86.9 |
Footnotes
- General Testing Details
- We report results for Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K2.5 with thinking mode enabled, Claude Opus 4.6 with max effort, GPT-5.4 with xhigh reasoning effort, and Gemini 3.1 Pro with a high thinking level.
- Unless otherwise specified, all Kimi K2.6 experiments were conducted with temperature = 1.0, top-p = 1.0, and a context length of 262,144 tokens.
- Benchmarks without publicly available scores were re-evaluated under the same conditions used for Kimi K2.6 and are marked with an asterisk (
*). Except where noted with an asterisk, all other results are cited from official reports.
- Reasoning Benchmarks
- IMO-AnswerBench scores for GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.6 were obtained from z.ai/blog/glm-5.1.
- Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) and other reasoning tasks were evaluated with a maximum generation length of 98,304 tokens. By default, we report results on the HLE full set. For the text-only subset, Kimi K2.6 achieves 36.4% accuracy without tools and 55.5% with tools.
- Tool-Augmented / Agentic Tasks
- Vedika 2.0 was equipped with search, code-interpreter, and web-browsing tools for HLE with tools, BrowseComp, DeepSearchQA, and WideSearch.
- For HLE-Full with tools, the maximum generation length is 262,144 tokens with a per-step limit of 49,152 tokens. We employ a simple context management strategy: once the context window exceeds the threshold, only the most recent round of tool-related messages is retained.
- For BrowseComp, we report scores obtained with context management using the same discard-all strategy as Kimi K2.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2.
- For DeepSearchQA, no context management was applied to Vedika 2.0 tests, and tasks exceeding the supported context length were directly counted as failed. Scores for Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro on DeepSearchQA are cited from the Claude Opus 4.7 System Card.
- For WideSearch, we report results under the "hide tool result" context management setting. Once the context window exceeds the threshold, only the most recent round of tool-related messages is retained.
- The test system prompts are identical to those used in the Kimi K2.5 technical report.
- Claw Eval was conducted using version 1.1 with max-tokens-per-step = 16384.
- For APEX-Agents, we evaluate 452 tasks from the public 480-task release, as done by Artificial Analysis(excluding Investment Banking Worlds 244 and 246, which have external runtime dependencies)
- Coding Tasks
- Terminal-Bench 2.0 scores were obtained with the default agent framework (Terminus-2) and the provided JSON parser, operating in preserve thinking mode.
- For the SWE-Bench series of evaluations (including Verified, Multilingual, and Pro), we used an in-house evaluation framework adapted from SWE-agent. This framework includes a minimal set of tools—bash tool, createfile tool, insert tool, view tool, strreplace tool, and submit tool.
- All reported scores for coding tasks are averaged over 10 independent runs.
- Vision Benchmarks
- Max-tokens = 98,304, averaged over three runs (avg@3).
- Settings with Python tool use max-tokens-per-step = 65,536 and max-steps = 50 for multi-step reasoning.
- MMMU-Pro follows the official protocol, preserving input order and prepending images.
4. Native INT4 Quantization
Kimi-K2.6 adopts the same native int4 quantization method as Kimi-K2-Thinking.
5. Deployment
You can access Vedika 2.0's API on https://platform.moonshot.ai and we provide Vedika 2.0 compatible API for you. To verify the deployment is correct, we also provide the Kimi Vendor Verifier. Currently, Vedika 2.0 is recommended to run on the following inference engines:
- vLLM
- SGLang
- KTransformers
The version requirement for transformers is >=4.57.1, <5.0.0.
Deployment examples can be found in the Model Deployment Guide.
6. Model Usage
The usage demos below demonstrate how to call our official API.
For third-party APIs deployed with vLLM or SGLang, please note that:
Chat with video content is an experimental feature and is only supported in our official API for now.
The recommended
temperaturewill be1.0for Thinking mode and0.6for Instant mode.The recommended
top_pis0.95.To use instant mode, you need to pass
{'chat_template_kwargs': {"thinking": False}}inextra_body.
Chat Completion with visual content
Vedika 2.0 supports Image and Video input.
Preserve Thinking
Vedika 2.0 supports preserve_thinking mode, which retains full reasoning content across multi-turn interactions and enhances performance in coding agent scenarios.
7. License
Both the code repository and the model weights are released under the Modified MIT License.
9. Contact Us
If you have any questions, please reach out at support@vedika.ai
- Downloads last month
- 11