I'm officially canceling my Hugging Face Pro subscription today. I supported this platform because it stood for true openness and neutrality. This acquisition by NVIDIA fundamentally changes that.
Here’s why I’m against this deal: - Neutrality is dead. NVIDIA is a US-based company. This means US regulations will inevitably dictate platform policies, creating direct pressure on Chinese developers and anyone building open-weight models outside the US. - Community over bureaucracy. NVIDIA is a massive, slow-moving corporation. This acquisition will likely drown the community in corporate processes and commercial interests. Soon, uploading a simple finetune might become a bureaucratic nightmare. - Open vs. Proprietary. Hugging Face was built on open-source ideals. NVIDIA? They are a fiercely proprietary hardware company with a minimal track record of meaningful open-source contributions. They sell chips, not freedom. - And to add insult to injury, NVIDIA has practically abandoned consumer RTX GPUs in 2026 to chase data center profits. Why would I pay them for "openness" when they've turned their back on the very developers who built this ecosystem?
I paid for openness. Not for a corporate takeover.
🤗 was about community.
12 replies
·
reactedtoDatdanboi25'spost with 🔥❤️about 20 hours ago
ForgeWorks, and is the first model to ever be trained on our TrainWork training framework.
Achieving an Intelligence Index of 6.87 and taking #22 in the <10m category on the AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard, very impressive work for a first model.
Meet KaLM-Jev — your local, Jev-style judgment engine, available in Nano, Small, and Large.
Building an agent or automation workflow? Sometimes all you need is a choice, a score, or a signal that a condition holds.
Built on KaLM-Reranker-R2, KaLM-Jev turns these decisions into structured outputs through three primitives:
🔀 Choice — select among candidates, with a probability distribution. 📊 Score — return a continuous score over your defined levels. 🔍 Noul — evaluate conditions independently, so multiple conditions can hold at once.
Think support-ticket routing, bug severity scoring, human-escalation detection, or candidate tool selection for agents.
🖥️ Run locally with downloaded weights 📦 Choose from Nano / Small / Large 🔌 Integrate through HTTP or Python ⚡ Reuse cached candidate/rule representations to reduce repeated encoding 🧪 Explore included examples, bilingual semantic smoke tests, and recorded GPU validation results
No answer-text generation: output_tokens = 0. Inference still runs to compute the judgments.
KaLM-Jev is an independent implementation based on KaLM-Reranker, not an official TypeSafe project or a guarantee of full Jev compatibility. Scores are uncalibrated; validate thresholds on your own tasks.
Personally, I don't think bot accounts on Hugging Face are a good thing, as we don't know how many accounts are run by automated systems versus how many actual users there are. Dead Internet theory is already a thing.
To clarify I am taking about LLM powered bot accounts and NOT rule base once like @parquet-converter or others.
also I'd like to talk with HUMANS not a machine so I'm going to hide messages from bots.
I turned the fruit fly's connectome into a language model. It learned broken English.
MaleCNS v1.0 (Janelia / Google), as released. 167,565 neurons, 25.6M synapses. I made that the core of a spiking net and trained synapse strengths only. The wiring is still the fly's.
It learned language. ~16M tokens in, it produces stuff like Once upon a time, there was a girl smiled. The language is in the brain's activity, not just the readout.
It sees through its own eyes. Photoreceptors on both eyes into the optic lobes. A dopamine reward through the fly's own PAM / PPL1 cells is what actually got it to use the pictures.
It's still a fly. Put it back in a whole-brain fly sim and sugar still fires the proboscis.
It can live as a fly again. 30 simulated days with the language synapses frozen: the rest of the brain adapted around them. Language and reflex both still there.
Talk to it, show it pictures, sugar test, or let it live 1-30 days:
bench-labs/cagliostro-v3 just hit an Intelligence Index of 26.13 on the AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard a 146M-param model trained completely from scratch on a single consumer GPU. That's 2nd place overall, and as far as I can tell, the most capable SLM trained on consumer hardware to date. Beating SmolLM-135m on 1/8th of the data is just silly levels of efficiency.
Introducing Cagliostro-v3, our new 146M parameter language model trained completely from scratch.
The run isn’t even finished yet.
At the current checkpoint:
• 146M parameters • 72.7B / 75B tokens trained • 26.27 Open SLM Index • 43.80 ArithMark-3 • Trained on a single RTX 5090 • ~90K to 103K tokens/sec during training • ~9 days for the full run • Apache 2.0
For some context, SmolLM2-135M scores 27.13 on the same Index after being trained on roughly 2 trillion tokens.
Cagliostro-v3 is currently at 26.27 with only ~72.7B.
That’s around 27x fewer training tokens.
The model also currently Hold the number 3rd spot for ArithMark-3, scoring 43.80
This wasn’t achieved by just throwing more tokens at the model. A huge part of v3 has been figuring out architecture, data mixture, and training dynamics at this scale.
The model uses a custom 30-layer decoder architecture with grouped-query attention and cross-head subspace attenuation, SwiGLU, RMSNorm, RoPE, tied embeddings, and a warmup-stable-decay training schedule.
During cooldown we also substantially shifted the data mixture toward higher-quality synthetic textbook and mathematics data, with the mathematics share increasing from 10% to 28%.
And everything is open.
The repository contains the training history with checkpoints pushed roughly every 30 minutes, so you can inspect how the model evolved throughout training rather than only seeing the final weights.
This is still a pre-final checkpoint. We have roughly 2.3B tokens left and the learning-rate cooldown is still running.
So 26.27 isn’t the final number.
Really excited to see where the last part of the run lands.
176 models, 54 orgs, 5 benchmarks, and a whole community of support!
Thanks to everyone who’s contributed models, reported issues, suggested benchmark improvements, or used the leaderboard to compare and evaluate small language models.
It’s been awesome watching the leaderboard grow into a broader community resource for transparent and reproducible SLM evaluation.